ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cyberism Perception-Interaction Layer: A Framework for AI-Enabled Sensing Between Humans and Cyberspace.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and sensing technologies increasingly mediate how humans encounter physical, bodily, and digital environments. Yet intelligent-sensor frameworks still emphasize accuracy, latency, power, and robustness while giving less attention to the perceptual relation created between humans and cyberspace. This conceptual and integrative review uses directed conceptual synthesis, purposive literature selection, contrastive case analysis, and negative-case testing to develop the perception-interaction layer of Cyberism for AI-enabled sensing. The synthesis distinguishes exteroceptive cyber-sensing, which extends or reconstructs familiar external senses; interoceptive cyber-sensing, which externalizes and interprets bodily states; and machine-native cyber-sensing, which translates modalities such as radar and LiDAR into humanly actionable perception. These sub-domains are mapped, on a many-to-many basis, to three proposed evaluation constructs that differ in measurement maturity: perceptual coherence, interoceptive agency, and perceptual explainability. Three hardware-constant examples, an integrated worked crosswalk, and an engineering signal-chain comparison show how the same sensing hardware can require different interfaces, monitoring provisions, and human outcome measures when its perceptual role changes. The framework remains a proposal requiring empirical validation, but it contributes an auditable method for linking AI sensor pipelines to uncertainty communication, feedback-induced distribution change, appropriate reliance, human agency, oversight, and differential performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.