ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Preliminary Smartphone-Based IMU System for Walking, Running, and Cycling Recognition Under Different Carrying Modes.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a preliminary smartphone-based inertial measurement unit (IMU) system for recognizing three common motion types, namely walking, running, and cycling, under different carrying modes. The proposed system is implemented on an Android smartphone and uses accelerometer and gyroscope signals to support both offline evaluation and on-device recognition. The current dataset contains six motion-carrying combinations formed by three motion types and two carrying modes, with more than 15 data segments collected for each category. Each segment lasts approximately 40-60+ s and was collected on flat ground. The raw sensor streams were processed using a sampling rate of 50 Hz, an 8 s sliding window, and a 4 s step size. To reduce data leakage, session-level splitting was adopted in the offline experiments. A K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier was used as the baseline recognition model, and different sensor combinations and feature settings were compared. The best offline configuration, using fused accelerometer and gyroscope features with the enhanced feature set and K = 3, achieved an accuracy of 86.57% and a macro-F1 score of 88.42%. On-device tests further showed stable recognition performance under hand-held conditions, while performance decreased under an unseen briefcase-style carrying condition, especially for walking and running. These results indicate that the proposed system is feasible as a preliminary smartphone-based motion recognition pipeline. At the current stage, the study should be interpreted as a pilot-scale feasibility evaluation under limited and partially unbalanced multi-subject data conditions, rather than a strict subject-independent generalization study. The findings nevertheless highlight the importance of carrying-mode diversity and more rigorous cross-subject evaluation in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.