ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beam-Hopping Scheduling for High-Priority and Time-Sensitive Services in Low-Earth-Orbit Satellite Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beam-Hopping (BH) dynamically adjusts beam pointing and dwell time to overcome the rigid resource allocation of traditional fixed beam coverage. This paper addresses the BH scheduling problem in low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellite networks for high-priority and time-sensitive services. A system-gain maximization model and a heuristic beam scheduling algorithm (HBSA) that pre-schedules critical traffic and greedily allocates remaining resources under interference and fairness constraints are proposed. Furthermore, this paper extends the framework with a graph reinforcement learning beam-hopping scheduling scheme (GRL-BHS) that captures structural network dependencies for near-optimal adaptive scheduling. Simulations against seven benchmarks show that the HBSA achieves near-optimal gain (within 2% of MWC and GRL-BHS), ensures high-priority satisfaction, maintains a Jain fairness index above 0.84 under heavy load, and reduces signaling overhead by an order of magnitude, while preserving a low polynomial complexity of O(T×J×K+T×K2). GRL-BHS offers the highest gain at the cost of offline training, whereas HBSA is the most balanced and practically deployable solution, providing a solid foundation for future intelligent BH scheduling in mega constellations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.