ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Stem Water Potential in Olive Orchards Using PlanetScope Imagery and Meteorological Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of water status in woody crops is essential for optimizing irrigation management, particularly under Mediterranean conditions characterized by high spatial and temporal variability. Traditional field-based stem water potential measurements are reliable but limited for large-scale operational applications. In this study, a supervised machine learning approach based on Extreme Gradient Boosting was developed to estimate stem water potential in Mediterranean olive orchards by integrating high-resolution PlanetScope multispectral imagery with meteorological variables describing atmospheric evaporative demand. The model was trained and evaluated using a dataset comprising 1628 measurements, curated from 1856 measurements collected during 2021-2025 after temporal matching and quality-control filtering, and 128 predictive features: 44 PlanetScope-derived spectral features and 84 meteorological predictors evaluated across six temporal positions (t0-t5). Model performance was assessed using cross-validation. The model achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.84, a root mean square error of 0.27, and a mean absolute error of 0.21. Air temperature, solar radiation, and reference evapotranspiration were the most influential predictors, while spectral information captured complementary effects related to canopy structure, vegetative vigor, and accumulated physiological responses. Furthermore, the combined use of spectral indices and PlanetScope base-band reflectance values was associated with an approximately 30% lower RMSE than that reported in previous approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.