ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Wearable Morphic Sensor for Unobtrusive Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Monitoring in ICU Patients: A Pilot Validation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis pilot study evaluated the real-world accuracy of a novel wearable morphic sensor system for unobtrusive, continuous heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) monitoring in critically ill patients within an intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA hybrid piezoresistive/piezoelectric disk-shaped sensor was placed on patients' backs to capture cardiorespiratory activity via forcecardiographic principles. Data were acquired from 15 ICU patients using a custom wireless recorder. The piezoelectric channel was processed using discrete wavelet transform and an adaptive peak detection algorithm. Derived HR and RR were compared against reference measurements from clinical patient monitors and a ventilator.
resultsBland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.39 ± 1.99 beats per minute for HR and 0.06 ± 0.90 breaths per minute for RR. Linear regression revealed strong correlation with clinical monitors (HR R-squared = 0.982; RR R-squared = 0.966). The device's RR performance matched the agreement between two independent clinical reference devices.
conclusionThe proposed system met the pre-specified bias and standard deviation criteria for HR and RR monitoring in bed-bound ICU patients. Its skin-adhesive-free design enables unobtrusive, continuous vital sign surveillance without direct skin contact. These findings support ICU monitoring. Step-down ward and ambulatory applications remain to be validated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.