ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Feature-Based Machine-Learning Spike Marking in Signal and Source Space EEG: A Proof-of-Principle Case Study of Focal Epilepsy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in electroencephalography (EEG) plays a crucial role in epilepsy diagnosis. Our work investigates the classification of IEDs using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) trained on EEG data represented in both signal and source space, in a proof-of-principle case study of focal epilepsy. Source waveforms were computed using a standard clinical source analysis procedure for the dipolar IED topographies, an equivalent current dipole model in a three-compartment head volume conductor model fitted using either a 1-parameter fixed-orientation or a 3-parameter projection approach, both localized to a single best-fit position during the rising flank of the IED. The ANN was trained on raw and feature-extracted versions of signal space and source space data. Feature extraction significantly improved performance across all domains. The highest accuracy (0.98) was achieved in signal space using Katz Fractional Dimension (KFD). In source space analyses, the 1-parameter and 3-parameter models achieved a maximum accuracy of 0.84, with statistical features performing best for the fixed-orientation model and KFD for the free orientation model. Additionally, annotations from three independent expert markers showed considerable variability, with ANN performance falling within the range of inter-expert agreement. While the findings of our proof-of-principle case study support the potential of feature-informed ANN tools to assist expert evaluation in clinical workflows, data from a single patient cannot capture inter-individual variability. Future work on a large, multi-patient cohort is needed to develop a population-generalizable detector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.