ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Detecting Wildfire Smoke Onset from Fixed View Camera Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: A wildfire smoke detector's practical worth is counted in minutes, not percentage points: an alarm raised ten minutes after ignition is worth far less than one raised at two, whatever the two systems' frame-level scores suggest. Time to detection, however, is almost always computed after training rather than optimized during it. (2) Methods: We treat incipient smoke not as an object to be recognized but as an onset to be caught: a faint, spatially coherent structure that thickens monotonically. At the same time, the rest of the scene continues behaving as it always has. The proposed study learns that habitual behavior from unlabeled fire-free video, surfaces departures from it as a per-tile prediction residual, and reads those residuals through an emergence field of four inspectable cues: residual magnitude, opacity accretion, motion coherence, and temporal persistence. Each common distractor fails a different cue, and detection delay and false alarms directly contribute to the loss. (3) Results: On FIgLib, the proposed study raises its first alarm 1.52 min after ignition while holding 0.21 false alarms per camera-day, and carries over to PyroNear-2025 and SKLFS-WildFire without labels from either. (4) Conclusions: Treating earliness as an optimization target rather than a reporting statistic yields detectors that stay both early and quiet on cameras they never saw in training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.