ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Identification Method for Seated Balance Control Based on Horizontal Support-Surface Sway and Dual Force-Platform Measurements.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying seated balance control may contribute to estimation of time delay and evaluation of vestibular weighting. However, few practical methods exist for measuring seated body motion or identifying seated balance control. This study aimed to estimate upper-body center of mass (COM) displacement during sitting under horizontal sway of the support surface using a practical measurement method and to identify a seated balance control system for each individual. Two force platforms under the buttocks and feet were synchronized with a support surface accelerometer. Under unpredictable horizontal perturbations composed of a multi-cosine waveform below 1.50 Hz, balance control was identified in an eyes-closed condition using a parametric model incorporating delayed COM state feedback and horizontal head acceleration feedback, the latter representing otolith-mediated detection of horizontal head acceleration. When validated against an optical motion capture system (five participants), the identified parameters exhibited an average relative error of less than 5%. A two-day reproducibility test (25 participants) yielded intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1,1)) of the four identified parameters ranging from 0.57 to 0.73, indicating moderate reliability. The identified head acceleration feedback gain may indicate head acceleration sensitivity, even among healthy adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.