ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cloud-Edge Collaborative Hardware Sensing with Dynamic Reliability Estimation and Evidence-Constrained Large Language Model Reasoning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Banking data centers generate heterogeneous IT operational streams from servers, network devices, edge nodes, and business terminals. Existing detectors are vulnerable to asynchronous sampling and unreliable channels, while separate root-cause and language-model modules cannot preserve an end-to-end evidence trail. This study presents a cloud-edge-end framework that couples sensor-quality-aware temporal encoding, topology- and chronology-constrained event-graph reasoning, and evidence-constrained language generation. At the edge, dynamic reliability scores suppress missing, noisy, delayed, drifting, and frozen channels. At the cloud layer, the model ranks root causes and identifies propagation relations and onset times from device topology, logs, alarms, and maintenance records. The language model then generates traceable incident interpretations from the resulting evidence package and rejects claims when support is insufficient or conflicting. Experiments use IT operational data collected from the headquarters and disaster-recovery data centers of a commercial bank between 2024 and 2025; the dataset contains no customer financial or transaction records. The proposed method achieves 95.38% Accuracy, 95.06% Precision, 94.71% Recall, a 94.88% F1-score, and a 97.41% AUC for hardware anomaly detection. Root-cause localization accuracy, Top-3 Accuracy, event-relation F1-score, and temporal localization error are 91.84%, 97.26%, 90.73%, and 1.82 s, respectively. The complete model attains a 94.68% evidence support rate and a 4.26% unsupported statement rate. These results show that reliability is propagated from sensing through system-level diagnosis to evidence-grounded interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.