ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Resilient Control Under Side-Channel Compromise for IoMT Devices.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) ecosystems expand, life-critical devices become increasingly vulnerable to microarchitectural leakage attacks that enable adversaries to evade conventional digital authentication mechanisms. Exploiting timing and cache leakage allows adversaries to extract credentials and issue cryptographically valid commands with physiologically unsafe parameters, a systemic weakness we define as the verified attacker problem. This work introduces a dual-layer physiological and side-channel defense architecture that maintains patient safety even under credential compromise. At the perception layer, single-lead 1D electrocardiogram (ECG) telemetry is restored using a 1D Denoising Autoencoder (1D-DAE) to counteract hardware perturbation proxies: actuation jitter, cache eviction block erasures, and password verification timing interference. The 1D-DAE maintains high signal reconstruction fidelity (PSNR≈29.1-36.7dB, SSIM≈0.81-0.89), stabilizing diagnostic classification accuracy above 90% across all perturbation conditions. At the actuation layer, a Control Barrier Function (CBF) filter enforces physical safe-set invariance, instantly projecting a malicious pacing command injection (ureq=300BPM) down to a safe 140BPM bound using real-time Quadratic Programming (QP). Hardware profiling yields an end-to-end execution latency of 2.09ms and a low 7.2mJ energy footprint per cycle, confirming real-time feasibility for continuous 360Hz telemetry monitoring and safe closed-loop pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.