ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Nanoparticle-Enabled Immune-Dose Shaping in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Reconciling Tumor Immunogenicity with Systemic Immune Preservation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy can simultaneously promote tumor immunogenicity and damage the systemic immune compartments required to sustain antitumor responses. In breast cancer, radiation-induced lymphopenia is influenced by treatment geometry, irradiated volume, low-dose exposure, marrow and lymphoid irradiation, fractionation, and delivery characteristics, while nanoparticle radioenhancement can amplify tumor response through physical, redox, DNA-repair, and immune mechanisms. This hypothesis-driven translational review examines whether nanoparticle-generated biological amplification could be redirected from tumor intensification toward immune-dose shaping while preserving tumor control and immunogenicity. The evidence supports seven interacting dimensions of potential exchange: physical dose, volume/spatial exposure, distributed low-dose exposure, marrow dose, geometry/modality, fractionation, and temporal/delivery exposure. Formal nanoparticle-enabled dose exchange remains limited, with the clearest breast-specific evidence confined to in vitro isoeffect analysis; no study has yet demonstrated preserved tumor isoeffect and immunogenicity together with reduced multicompartment immune injury after nanoparticle-enabled exposure reduction. We, therefore, propose a dual-endpoint framework integrating tumor control, immunogenicity, multicompartment immune preservation, dosimetry, and nanoparticle biodistribution, together with a staged translational pathway from quantitative preclinical exchange studies to comparative clinical testing. This strategy remains hypothesis-generating, with triple-negative breast cancer representing a particularly informative initial setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.