ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Tree Responses to Combined Drought and Low-Nitrogen Stress: A Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drought and low nitrogen often co-occur in forests, yet their combined effects cannot be inferred reliably from single-stress studies. This review synthesizes physiological and molecular evidence for tree responses to combined drought and low nitrogen at four levels, namely stress perception, signal transduction, metabolic reprogramming, and adaptive phenotypes. It compares single-stress baselines and evaluates reported interactions in photosynthesis, water-use efficiency, root traits, and carbon-nitrogen allocation. The review distinguishes direct tree evidence from mechanistic context derived from crops and model plants. Abscisic acid-nitrogen signaling crosstalk is considered alongside reactive oxygen species, energy, hydraulics, and transcriptional regulation as candidate integration routes. Candidate genes are classified by species context and experimental evidence; responsiveness to the two single stresses is not interpreted as proof of a combined-stress function. The review also assesses the opportunities and current limitations of multi-omics and genome editing for trees. It identifies priorities for factorial experiments, multi-year validation, and molecular breeding for climate-resilient forestry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.