ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Circular RNAs in Skeletal Muscle Aging and Sarcopenia: Mechanistic Evidence, Biomarker Potential, and Therapeutic Readiness.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle aging arises from interacting defects in proteostasis, mitochondrial quality control, inflammatory signaling, neuromuscular integrity, regenerative capacity, and mechanical-metabolic plasticity, and may culminate in sarcopenia. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are plausible regulators and biomarker candidates, but most evidence derives from developmental myogenesis, expression profiling, or non-aging atrophy models. This critical review organizes the literature around skeletal muscle aging and applies a four-level framework encompassing discovery, mechanistic support, in vivo causality, and functional intervention. We assess human linkage, species, treatment timing, locus of action, and endogenous or engineered modality separately. circSnd1 and circDdb1 currently provide the strongest combination of functional preclinical evidence and association with aged human skeletal muscle. circFUT10, circBBS9, circNEB, and circGLIS3 define less mature regenerative, discovery, histological, or muscle-quality domains. Non-aging atrophy studies, including circTmeff1 and engineered circmiR-29b, test whether proposed mechanisms remain active under defined catabolic stress. Human blood and serum-vesicle studies provide discovery-level associations with strength or mobility, but clinical validation of a circulating circRNA biomarker for sarcopenia remains insufficient. Therapeutic development is constrained by quantitative target credibility, systemic skeletal-muscle exposure, post-onset functional efficacy in aged organisms, safety, reversibility, and independent replication. The field should now prioritize rigorous validation over additional descriptive cataloging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.