ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Constant Light Versus Intermittent Constant Light/Recovery Regimen: Differential Effects on Pineal Ultrastructure, Clock Gene Protein Abundance, and Systemic Metabolism in Rats.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disruption of the natural light regimen is considered a key pathogenetic factor in the development of desynchronosis and associated diseases. The pineal gland, as a neuroendocrine organ, is a central component of the circadian system and the primary target of the pathogenic effects of disrupted lighting. However, it remains unclear whether the mechanisms of pineal damage differ between different types of light stress. In this study, 120 male Wistar rats underwent a comprehensive analysis of the morphofunctional state of the pineal gland under two lighting regimens: constant lighting and intermittent constant light. Using light and electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and cosinor analysis, it was established that the two regimens induce qualitatively different types of light stress. The obtained data indicate that constant lighting induces a degenerative phenotype with loss of rhythmic organization, whereas the shift regimen produces a phenotype of chronic re-adaptation with hyperactivation of the lysosomal system, paradoxical overexpression of clock genes, and pronounced metabolic disturbances. The identified differential markers may serve as a basis for preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of chronobiotic therapy and for the development of prevention strategies for disorders associated with shift work and light pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.