ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Network Pharmacology-Guided Phytochemical Polypharmacology: Integrating Molecular Mechanisms, Experimental Validation and Clinical Translation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Network pharmacology offers a systems-level framework for prioritising potential multi-target actions of phytochemicals, but predicted network convergence alone does not establish pharmacologically relevant polypharmacology. This structured narrative review evaluates curcumin, berberine, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), and resveratrol as representative case studies, drawing on substantial mechanistic, pharmacokinetic, and translational literature. Evidence is appraised across computational prediction, biochemical interaction, cellular pathway modulation, target engagement or functional validation, in vivo pharmacology, and human evidence, with an emphasis on exposure compatibility. Across the four compounds, overlapping effects on inflammatory, metabolic, stress-response, and growth-regulatory pathways are supported predominantly by cellular and pathway-level studies. In contrast, direct target engagement, causal contribution, and clinically achievable exposure are less consistently demonstrated. Human pharmacokinetic and tissue-exposure studies show that systemic parent-compound concentrations may differ markedly from those used in mechanistic experiments, although local exposure and metabolites can modify this relationship. Clinical studies support selected pharmacodynamic or metabolic effects but do not establish that therapeutic benefit results from the simultaneous engagement of the broad, predicted target networks. Emerging computational, experimental, and delivery approaches can strengthen hypothesis prioritisation but do not replace mechanistic validation. We propose an exposure-aware, evidence-tiered framework in which clinically meaningful phytochemical polypharmacology requires convergence of achievable exposure, target engagement, causal pharmacodynamics, and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.