SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Iron Chelation Therapy in Iron Overload Disorders: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis of Bioenergetic Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Biomarker-Guided Management.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron overload associated with transfusion-dependent disorders promotes oxidative stress, mitochondrial bioenergetic dysfunction, and ferroptotic cell death. Although iron chelation therapy remains the cornerstone of management, the mechanistic links between iron burden, subcellular injury, and emerging biomarkers have not been comprehensively integrated within a clinically relevant framework. This systematic review aimed to synthesize clinical and preclinical evidence on the effects of iron chelation therapy on systemic iron burden, mitochondrial bioenergetics, oxidative stress, ferroptosis, and biomarker-guided management. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from January 2000 to June 2026, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The database search yielded 465 records. After removing 120 duplicates, 345 unique records were screened by title and abstract, of which 210 did not satisfy the predefined eligibility criteria. The remaining 135 articles underwent full-text assessment; 45 were excluded because of inappropriate study design (n = 20), lack of relevant outcomes (n = 15), or unavailable full texts (n = 10). Of the 90 remaining articles, 29 studies (7 randomized controlled trials, 6 observational studies, 3 systematic reviews or guidelines, 6 experimental animal studies and 7 in vitro or cellular mechanistic studies) were included for qualitative narrative synthesis. An additional 61 review articles, guidelines, and epidemiological reports were retained for background context. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and SYRCLE tools. Clinical evidence indicated that deferoxamine, deferiprone, and deferasirox consistently reduce systemic iron burden, reflected by improvements in serum ferritin, liver iron concentration, and cardiac T2* magnetic resonance imaging. Circulating iron-related biomarkers, including non-transferrin-bound iron and labile plasma iron, provided additional information on redox-active iron exposure. Preclinical evidence further suggested that iron chelation may attenuate mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and ferroptotic signaling. However, mechanistic biomarkers of mitochondrial bioenergetics, oxidative injury, and ferroptosis remain insufficiently validated in prospective clinical populations. Considerable heterogeneity in study populations, interventions, biomarker methodologies, and clinical and mechanistic outcomes limited direct quantitative comparison and supported a narrative synthesis approach. Current evidence supports iron chelation as an effective strategy for reducing systemic iron burden, while emerging bioenergetic, redox, and ferroptosis-related biomarkers provide promising mechanistic insights into iron-mediated cellular injury. Nevertheless, their clinical utility remains uncertain because of limited prospective validation, methodological heterogeneity, and insufficient standardization. Future translational studies should integrate conventional iron indices with validated mitochondrial and redox biomarkers and determine whether biomarker-guided chelation strategies can improve clinically meaningful outcomes beyond conventional iron-burden monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.