ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
In Silico Pre-Screening as a Design-Assessment Tool for Gold Nanoparticle-Amplified DNA Displacement Assays: Identifying Sequence-Level Design Limitations Across Electrode and Magnetic-Bead Configurations.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for decentralised and point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid testing has increased interest in label-free, sequence-specific DNA biosensors and computational approaches that can guide their design before extensive experimental optimisation. Here, an in silico workflow was first employed to evaluate a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-amplified, target-induced DNA displacement assay. Nearest-neighbour duplex thermodynamics, DNA secondary-structure analysis, and High Ambiguity Driven biomolecular DOCKing (HADDOCK) were used to assess sequence complementarity and displacement behaviour. The analyses confirmed Watson-Crick complementarity among the electrode capture, reporter, and target sequences and identified an unintended mismatch in the magnetic bead-capture probe. HADDOCK analyses using default RNA and explicit DNA settings consistently favoured target over non-target displacement, although control poses were more setting-sensitive. Experimental testing subsequently provided supporting evidence for the computational assessment. Electrochemical measurements showed the anticipated signal hierarchy of target > non-target > buffer, although differences were not statistically significant at the replicate numbers tested. The magnetic bead platform produced weak, non-differential responses, consistent with the sequence-level design limitation identified computationally. Together, these findings demonstrate the utility of computational pre-screening for interrogating displacement mechanisms, identifying correctable design errors, and guiding rational experimental optimisation of nucleic acid biosensors. No statistically significant target discrimination was achieved at the replicate numbers tested, and the proposed corrected bead-capture sequence has not been experimentally validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.