ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Fungi in Asthma: From Epidemiology and Airway Mycobiome to Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Allergenic Phytopathogens.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungal exposure and sensitization are linked to asthma severity, but their clinical significance varies by host, exposure context, and disease phenotype. This review integrates epidemiological, immunological, and clinical evidence on fungal-associated asthma, distinguishing environmental exposure, allergic sensitization, and persistent airway colonization. We examine how fungal allergens, proteases, and cell-wall components engage pattern-recognition receptors, disrupt epithelial barriers, and activate overlapping type 2 and type 17 inflammatory pathways. Studies of the airway and intestinal mycobiome offer additional perspectives on host-fungal interactions, although most human findings remain associative and do not establish causality or clinical utility. Severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) are distinct clinical contexts that require different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Antifungal treatment has an established role in ABPA, whereas evidence in SAFS is inconsistent; biologic selection should be guided by clinical phenotype and established eligibility criteria rather than fungal sensitization alone. We also synthesize our published biochemical, epithelial-cell, and murine studies of seven plant-associated fungal and oomycete taxa from eastern Poland. These findings support further investigation of their allergenic and pro-inflammatory potential but do not establish clinical allergenicity or predict treatment response in humans. Priorities include standardized exposure assessment, validated diagnostic reagents, and longitudinal studies linking fungal measurements to clinical outcomes. Expanded allergen panels and mycobiome-based approaches require prospective validation before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.