ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Achondroplasia: Current Disease-Modifying Therapies and Genome Editing Strategies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achondroplasia (ACH) is the most common non-lethal skeletal dysplasia and is caused in the vast majority of cases by a heterozygous gain-of-function variant in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3, p.Gly380Arg). Hyperactive FGFR3 signaling constrains endochondral bone growth by suppressing growth-plate chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic differentiation. In the past decade, management has expanded beyond supportive care, and several mechanism-based interventions have shown disease-modifying effects in clinical studies. These include the activation of the NPR2/CNP axis with vosoritide and navepegritide and the pharmacologic attenuation of FGFR signaling with infigratinib, while extracellular biologics designed to modulate ligand-receptor interactions remain investigational. In parallel, gene-based approaches are increasingly discussed as routes toward the etiology-directed control of the causal driver, ranging from the cartilage-biased tuning of FGFR3 expression to variant-level genome editing concepts. Here, we synthesize the current therapeutic landscape, explicitly distinguish pathway-targeted disease modification from etiology-directed genetic strategies, and highlight the key translational barriers for gene-based approaches, including target-tissue delivery to the growth-plate, dose control and durability across development, redosing and immunogenicity constraints, and long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.