ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Metal Hypersensitivity in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Molecular Immunopathogenesis, Diagnostic Controversies, and Prospects for Precision Medicine.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implant-related metal hypersensitivity (MH) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an uncommon and diagnostically challenging complication in which antigen-specific T-cell responses may coexist with nonspecific inflammatory reactions to wear and corrosion products. This narrative review critically summarizes current evidence on the molecular immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of suspected MH, with particular emphasis on HLA-associated susceptibility and the 2023 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) mechanistic nomenclature. A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was used to identify relevant clinical, immunological, and consensus literature. Metal sensitization is substantially more common than clinically relevant implant-associated hypersensitivity, and positive patch or lymphocyte transformation tests do not by themselves establish causality. Current evidence supports selective, clinically contextualized testing after exclusion of infection and mechanical causes; routine preoperative screening in patients without a suggestive history is not recommended. HLA class II associations and metal-peptide-MHC/T-cell receptor interactions provide a plausible molecular basis for interindividual susceptibility, but available genetic data remain insufficient for clinical risk stratification or implant selection. Future studies should integrate standardized phenotyping, quantitative metal exposure, histopathology, and molecular immune profiling before implementing precision arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.