Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42883795›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

A Drug-Referenced Machine-Learning Framework for Prioritizing Korean Herbal Formulations in Hypertension Using Linear SVM and Graph Convolutional Networks.

Dong-Woo Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dong-Woo LimDepartment of Diagnostics, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang 10326, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3179-9439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is regulated by interacting molecular systems, providing a rationale for network-based screening of multicomponent therapeutic candidates. Grounded in the conceptual framework of network pharmacology, we developed a hypertension-focused computational framework to prioritize insurance-covered Korean herbal formulations using protein-protein interaction networks derived from marketed antihypertensive and comparator drugs. Thirty reference-drug graphs (15 antihypertensive and 15 comparator drugs) were evaluated using four molecular classifiers under repeated group-aware nested cross-validation. Among them, a linear support vector machine (SVM) integrating protein presence, hypertension-specific disease weight, and normalized degree achieved the highest performance (AUROC, 0.956 ± 0.007) and was applied to rank 56 herbal formulations. Across the 56 formulations, 229 unique representative compounds were retained after deduplication and used to construct formulation-specific molecular networks. The resulting protein-level SVM interpretation identified 110 directionally stable proteins associated with discrimination of the antihypertensive reference set from comparator drugs. No individual protein met strict permutation-calibrated q < 0.05, although eight proteins reached exploratory q < 0.10. Network analysis revealed a 30-protein ion-channel/excitability-associated module with the strongest aggregate model effect (empirical

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineGraph Neural NetworksHumansProtein Interaction MapsRepublic of KoreaAntihypertensive Agentsdrug repurposinggraph convolutional networkherb–compound–gene networkhypertensionKorean herbal formulationmachine learningnetwork pharmacologyprotein–protein interaction network

Identifiers

PMID42883795
PMCPMC13665111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.