SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Effects of ADHD Medications on Male Reproductive Function: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Mammalian Evidence.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term treatment with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications may begin before reproductive maturity, but their effects on male reproductive health remain uncertain. We systematically evaluated controlled in vivo mammalian evidence on male reproductive effects of medications used for ADHD, including the consistency, timing, reversibility, and certainty of reported associations. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 8 August 2026. Eligible studies were English-language, controlled in vivo mammalian experiments evaluating a prespecified ADHD medication and at least one male reproductive outcome. Human, in-vitro-only, uncontrolled, conference-abstract, and preprint reports were excluded. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two reviewers using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool, and certainty was evaluated using an adapted preclinical Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results were grouped by drug and nine prespecified outcome domains and synthesized narratively. Meta-analysis was not performed because of substantial methodological and outcome heterogeneity. Twenty-two studies were included: 19 evaluated methylphenidate (MPH), two clonidine, and one lisdexamfetamine (LDX); 17 were conducted in rats, four in mice, and one in rhesus macaques. During active MPH exposure, adverse changes predominated in spermatogenesis, sperm quantity or quality, testicular or epididymal microstructure, testosterone, and apoptotic or inflammatory markers. Findings after drug-free follow-up were more often neutral, mixed, or partially reversible. Possible persistent sperm DNA fragmentation and adverse paternal embryonic outcomes were reported but were based on few studies with clustering concerns. Clonidine studies indicated altered epididymal contractility and transport, whereas the single high-dose LDX study reported adverse sperm, testicular, endocrine, DNA-fragmentation, and inflammatory findings. Risk-of-bias assessments were dominated by unclear judgments. None of the 18 drug-by-outcome-domain bodies of evidence reached high or moderate certainty; all were rated as very low certainty. Evidence was limited by small samples, heterogeneous species, developmental stages, doses, routes, exposure durations and assays, incomplete numerical reporting, serious indirectness to therapeutic use in men, and sparse replication outside MPH. ADHD medications, particularly MPH during active exposure, show a possible male reproductive toxicity signal in animal models, but the evidence does not permit quantitative risk estimation or class-wide or clinical conclusions. Better-controlled, exposure-validated animal studies and prospective human cohorts are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.