ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Novel Therapeutic Opportunities in Precision Oncology.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping molecular oncology by making complex biological data tractable and by extending the reach of precision drug discovery. Its emerging value is particularly evident at the interface of immunoengineering and targeted therapy, where computational models can help prioritize tumor-selective antigens, predict neoantigen immunogenicity, optimize engineered receptors, support antibody and antibody-drug conjugate design, guide small-molecule discovery, refine genome-editing strategies, and anticipate treatment response. Across these applications, the central promise is not automation for its own sake, but a wider therapeutic window in which tumor control is increased while off-target toxicity is reduced. Yet the translational gap remains substantial. Many models are still preclinical, external validation is limited, and clinical implementation remains uncommon. This Commentary follows representative methods across a therapeutic continuum that now extends from target discovery and therapeutic engineering to imaging, liquid biopsy, resistance forecasting, combination selection, and drug repurposing. We argue that clinical value will depend on closed-loop workflows in which multimodal predictions are experimentally validated, externally tested, and longitudinally updated to guide the next therapeutic decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.