ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Power Ultrasound as an Intensification Strategy in Food Biomanufacturing: Applications, Mechanisms and Perspectives.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Power ultrasound has been investigated as an intensification tool for fermentation, aging, enzymatic hydrolysis, and extraction in food biomanufacturing. Treatment outcomes vary with matrix properties, application stage, acoustic exposure, and evaluation criteria, leaving optimization largely empirical. This review compares ultrasound applications across these four operations and evaluates combinations with pulsed electric fields, cold atmospheric plasma, microwave processing, and membrane separation. Potential roles in precision fermentation, microbial protein production, synthetic microbial communities, and cell-free or multi-enzyme biomanufacturing are also examined. Applications are organized by treatment stage for fermentation and hydrolysis and by product class for aging and extraction. Mechanistic evidence is interpreted according to the mechanical and chemical effects involved and the process limitation addressed. Substrate restructuring is most beneficial when physical accessibility limits conversion or compound release, whereas microbial and enzyme tolerance often constrains ultrasound intensity during fermentation and hydrolysis. Combining ultrasound with other technologies offers opportunities to exploit their complementary strengths. Emerging food biomanufacturing platforms are potential areas for expanding ultrasound applications. The value of ultrasound lies in addressing the main limitation of each process without compromising product quality. Industrial translation will require reproducible control of acoustic exposure, consistent product performance, and sufficient processing gains to justify electrical energy consumption and equipment costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.