ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Reviewing Physiological Measures of Implicit Consumer Response to Food.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review provides information about the contribution of the different physiological and neural methods of measuring consumer responses to food and discusses their potential for improving the understanding of processes underlying food pleasure and choice. A substantial body of work (132 studies published between 2011 and 2026) has recorded consumers' implicit responses to foods, using physiological (ANS) methods such as Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Heart Rate (HR), Pupil Size (PS), and facial expressions; and neuronal methods such as Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) indicators (GSR, HR, and PS) are activated during smelling or eating, with variations across products, likely reflecting the role of the ANS in the anticipatory and alert mechanisms of the body in response to food. However, the analysis of its relationship with explicit liking showed discrepancies depending on the study (product, protocol, context), indicating that they provide information about consumers' reactions that are different from those explicitly reported. Neuronal measures show differences in brain activity in response to foods, with fMRI identifying regions such as the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Somatosensory Cortex in response to foods. Integration of self-report assessment, implicit behaviour, physiological, and neural responses may provide a deeper understanding of the neural pathways linking sensory perception, autonomic activation, consumer decisions, and food-related pleasure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.