ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Different Thermal Treatments on Quality and Myofibrillar Protein Properties of Shelled Chinese Mitten Crab (
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To reduce the difficulty of shell-meat separation while minimizing quality deterioration, this study compared the effects of two thermal treatments, traditional steaming (TS) and a part-specific mild steaming (MS) strategy, on the quality and myofibrillar protein (MP) properties of Chinese mitten crab meat, using raw crab meat (RM) as the reference. Results showed that the MS group exhibited pH and moisture content closer to those of RM, while no significant difference was observed in total volatile basic nitrogen and centrifugal loss compared with RM, suggesting that MS treatment caused less pronounced changes in physicochemical quality and water-holding properties. Meanwhile, electronic nose and electronic tongue analyses revealed that MS closely resembled RM, whereas TS deviated markedly, suggesting that MS treatment effectively preserved the natural sensory quality of crab meat. MS induced only moderate decreases in MP content, total and active sulfhydryl contents, and surface hydrophobicity. Its turbidity, particle size, and ultraviolet absorption spectra remained largely consistent with RM, while endogenous fluorescence and circular dichroism spectra exhibited substantially smaller changes than those in TS. These findings indicate that MS causes only mild conformational adjustments of MPs and less pronounced protein aggregation than TS. Overall, MS effectively reduces shell-meat separation difficulty while maximally preserving the inherent quality of crab meat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.