ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application of Ultrasound for the Modification of Techno-Functional and Physicochemical Properties in Cereal and Pseudocereal Protein Isolates: A Systematic Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cereal and pseudocereal protein isolates are increasingly investigated as sustainable food ingredients, although their limited solubility, interfacial activity, foaming performance, and hydration properties can restrict their technological application. This systematic review evaluated the effects of ultrasound on the physicochemical and techno-functional properties of protein isolates from cereals and pseudocereals. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and included 26 experimental studies identified from Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley, and Consensus. Owing to substantial heterogeneity in protein sources, sonication conditions, analytical methods, and outcome metrics, the evidence was synthesized narratively rather than by meta-analysis. Overall, ultrasound promoted aggregate disruption, particle-size reduction, partial unfolding, and greater exposure of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups, which generally improved solubility, emulsifying activity and stability, foaming capacity and stability, water- and oil-holding capacities, and, in some studies, in vitro digestibility. The magnitude and direction of these effects depended on botanical origin and protein composition, as well as on pH, treatment time, acoustic power, and the sequence of combined processes. Treatments integrating ultrasound with pH shifting, heat, glycation, enzymatic modification, or high hydrostatic pressure often produced greater functional improvements than ultrasound alone. Ultrasound is therefore a promising approach for tailoring cereal and pseudocereal protein functionality, although standardized acoustic reporting and scale-up studies remain necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.