ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Speed and Sensitivity to Robust Reliability: Addressing the Detection Bias of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) in Food Authentication.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food adulteration poses severe threats to the integrity and safety of global food supply chains. Innovations in analytical techniques, especially the rapid development of LAMP-based detection methods, are indispensable for addressing these risks. However, the dominant research paradigm, which has long prioritized accelerated amplification kinetics and ultralow detection limits, largely obscures a critical limitation: insufficient detection reliability when deployed in complex field environments. This review consolidates state-of-the-art advances targeting reliability optimization and delineates key technical strategies to construct robust, improved-reliability LAMP platforms for real-food testing. Specifically, we summarize critical factors at the reaction and readout levels that compromise the reliability of LAMP under realistic scenarios, such as inexperienced operators, degraded samples, matrices containing inhibitory substances, and uncontrolled environments. We further elaborate on effective solutions to bridge the reliability gap between laboratory validation and on-site deployment, which requires coordinated technical improvements throughout the full LAMP testing pipeline. Ultimately, we propose a forward-looking developmental principle for next-generation LAMP assays: analytical reliability and operational robustness should be elevated to equal priority alongside the traditionally pursued ultra-rapid amplification and high sensitivity. This balanced technical framework may help pave the way toward large-scale standardization of LAMP-enabled food authentication, although its presumptive results must be confirmed by an independent validated method before they can support regulatory enforcement or other formal decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.