ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
D-pFoodReQ: Answer-Frequency-Aware Debiasing for Constrained Knowledge-Base Question Answering in Food Recommendation.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food recommendation systems must satisfy dietary preferences and nutritional, health, and ingredient constraints. In constrained food knowledge-base question answering, unequal positive training-answer frequency may influence ranking without necessarily reflecting query-recipe fit. We develop D-pFoodReQ by replacing the pFoodReQ answer ranker with BAMnet-D while retaining its food-knowledge and constraint-processing pipeline. BAMnet-D introduces a separate answer-frequency branch alongside semantic matching, applies candidate-set-relative loss reweighting, and uses a counterfactual-inspired intervention that sets the explicit frequency input to zero during validation and testing. Across three runs using the same protocol on the pFoodReQ benchmark, D-pFoodReQ achieved an F1 score of 62.96 ± 2.06%, compared with 61.33 ± 2.27% for pFoodReQ. Its mean average precision and mean average recall were 66.50 ± 0.54% and 65.38 ± 0.66%, respectively. On 1355 questions for which no gold answer appeared as a positive training label, D-pFoodReQ attained a mean answer-set F1 nearly identical to that of pFoodReQ while achieving higher Recall@5 and NDCG@5. Ablation and output-composition analyses indicated that loss reweighting alone did not account for the full improvement, while retaining the explicit frequency term was associated with a larger share of answers observed as positive training labels. These results support answer-frequency-aware ranking for constrained food knowledge-base question answering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.