ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrated Machine Learning and Statistical Interpretation of Malachite Green Removal by SDBS-Modified Ostrich Bone Waste: A Comparative Random Forest, Bayesian Regression, and LMG Analysis.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of sustainable adsorbents and reliable predictive tools for dye-contaminated wastewater treatment remains an important challenge in environmental engineering. In this study, the adsorption of malachite green (MG) dye onto sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS)-modified ostrich bone waste was investigated using an integrated modeling framework combining Lindeman-Merenda-Gold (LMG) analysis, Bayesian Regression (BR), and Random Forest (RF) modeling. 52 experimental conditions (each measured in triplicate) were analyzed to evaluate the influence of pH, contact time, initial dye concentration, temperature, adsorbent dosage, and SDBS dosage on dye removal efficiency. The three modeling approaches consistently identified pH and contact time as the two most influential operational variables, whereas the relative importance of initial dye concentration and adsorbent dosage differed among the methods. BR quantified the direction and uncertainty of predictor effects, yielding posterior coefficients of 0.650 (95% CrI: 0.365-0.935) for pH, 0.467 (95% CrI: 0.263-0.672) for contact time, and -0.517 (95% CrI: -0.759 to -0.272) for initial dye concentration. Under internal validation, RF yielded an OOB R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.