ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Corosolic Acid in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular Properties, Evidence Boundaries, and Development Priorities.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and remains a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Corosolic acid (CA), an ursane-type pentacyclic triterpenoid with antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and antitumour activities, has attracted interest as a potential natural compound for HCC treatment. This review critically evaluates CA as a molecular lead for HCC by integrating its physicochemical characteristics with direct preclinical evidence, cross-model hypotheses, and development constraints. Current studies indicate that CA suppresses HCC cell proliferation and migration, disrupts cell-cycle progression, and promotes cell death, with antitumour effects also observed in animal models. These activities have been associated with mitochondrial apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress, Yes-associated protein (YAP)-related growth regulation, increased susceptibility to ferroptosis, and inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-related migratory signalling. Interestingly, evidence from other tumour, metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrotic models further suggests that CA may influence tumour metabolism, autophagy, the immunosuppressive microenvironment, fibrosis, and angiogenesis. However, these cross-model findings require direct validation in HCC. Although CA shows promising preclinical activity, it should be regarded as a natural lead compound rather than an established HCC therapy. Major unresolved gaps include poorly defined dose-exposure-response relationships, limited validation of the principal mechanisms in clinically relevant HCC models, and insufficient evidence that optimised formulations or combination regimens improve efficacy without increasing toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.