Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42883211›Full record

SynthesisMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Emerging Processing Technologies for Modulating Allergenic Proteins in Legumes and Gluten-Containing Cereals: A Systematic Review.

Jose Aaron Ortiz-Zapata, Rebeca Salvador-Reyes, Marcio Schmiele, Raniere Ribeiro Lima, Ernesto Dante Rodríguez-Lafitte, Zecarlos Hugo Solano-Santisteban, Bruno Martins Dala-Paula, Luis Miguel Anaya-Esparza, Edward Florencio Aurora-Vigo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jose Aaron Ortiz-ZapataEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-5669-5735
Rebeca Salvador-ReyesFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 150101, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-5742
Marcio SchmieleInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8830-1710
Raniere Ribeiro LimaInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil.
Ernesto Dante Rodríguez-LafitteEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Zecarlos Hugo Solano-SantistebanEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Bruno Martins Dala-PaulaFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Luis Miguel Anaya-EsparzaUniversidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de los Altos, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias y Agrícolas, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9194-1719
Edward Florencio Aurora-VigoEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9731-4318

Funding

Universidad Señor de Sipán 20479748102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legumes and gluten-containing cereals are major sources of plant protein, but they also contain immunoreactive proteins that may resist processing and gastrointestinal digestion. This systematic review examined how emerging processing technologies affect these proteins, focusing on immunoreactivity, antigenicity, molecular structure, digestibility, techno-functional properties, and the analytical methods used to measure these responses. Searches were conducted in Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection according to PRISMA 2020, resulting in 95 eligible studies. Soybean and wheat were the most studied matrices, representing 35% and 30% of the included studies, respectively. Most experiments were conducted in vitro and relied on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, Western blotting, electrophoresis, or simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Direct biological evidence was scarce. Ultrasound and irradiation were the most frequently investigated technologies, followed by microwave processing, cold plasma, extrusion, high-pressure processing, electric fields, enzymatic hydrolysis, and pH shifting. These treatments induced protein unfolding, aggregation, fragmentation, oxidation, secondary-structure rearrangement, changes in sulfhydryl-group accessibility, and shifts in digestibility and techno-functional behavior. Decreased antibody recognition was reported more consistently in legumes, especially after combined treatments. Responses in gluten-containing cereals were less predictable and ranged from partial reduction to no change or increased recognition, depending on the matrix, treatment intensity, extraction procedure, and immunological assay. Emerging technologies can therefore modify protein structure and analytical immunoreactivity. Current evidence, however, does not establish that these changes reduce clinical allergenicity or gluten-related immunogenicity.

Indexed as

AllergensEdible GrainFabaceaeFood HandlingGlutensPlant ProteinsHumansAllergensGlutensPlant Proteinsemerging processingfood allergyglutenIgE bindingimmunoreactivitylegume proteinsprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID42883211
PMCPMC13666922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.