ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strategies for MOF Functionalization in Pyrotechnics and Propellants: Internal and Interfacial Approaches.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) provide a modular platform for controlling energetic performance, ignition, combustion, thermal stability, and safety, but the structural origin of these effects is often difficult to distinguish from interfacial contributions in multicomponent pyrotechnic formulations. This review organizes MOF functionalization according to the dominant level of modification: internal-framework functionalization (IF), including linker, metal-node, pore, counterion, and guest engineering, and external/interfacial functionalization (EF), including interfaces with metallic or boron fuels, carbon materials, oxidizers, and polymer matrices. Only systems in which intact MOFs are introduced into the energetic formulation are considered, and representative studies are compared through structure-mechanism-response relationships. The analysis shows that IF primarily governs intrinsic chemical reactivity, redox pathways, energetic content, initiation mode, and sensitivity, whereas EF determines how efficiently this functionality is delivered through heat, mass, and charge transfer and spatial contact. Reported improvements in decomposition, ignition, combustion, and pressure generation are strongly condition-dependent and may involve trade-offs in sensitivity, compatibility, or active-fuel fraction. Functionalization should therefore be selected according to the rate-limiting stage of the target formulation, with matched controls and formulation-level validation required for mechanistic interpretation and practical design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.