ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Reimagining Cannabidiol Delivery Through Carbon Nanodots.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a highly lipophilic phytocannabinoid whose low aqueous solubility, variable oral absorption, extensive first-pass metabolism, and chemical instability motivate advanced delivery strategies. Carbon nanodots (CNDs) have tunable surface chemistry and photoluminescence and have been investigated as carriers for multiple therapeutic cargos. This review critically evaluates whether the literature supports a specific CBD-CND delivery advantage. A structured narrative search of PubMed and targeted publisher websites was conducted. Evidence was classified as direct CBD-CND evidence, indirect CND-platform evidence, or indirect CBD-nanoformulation evidence. No direct study was identified that characterized CBD loading on CNDs and then demonstrated release, pharmacokinetics, safety, or therapeutic efficacy. Existing support is therefore indirect: CNDs can carry other drugs, whereas lipid, polymeric, micellar, and transdermal systems can improve selected CBD formulation or preclinical endpoints. Consequently, improved solubility, targeting, lower toxicity, enhanced bioavailability, and therapeutic synergy remain hypotheses for CBD-CND systems. The review retains a broad discussion of possible applications while clearly separating demonstrated evidence from proposed uses and defining the analytical, comparative, pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, and toxicological studies needed to validate the platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.