Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42883096›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

The Effect of Broiler-Targeted Lighting Programs on Productivity, Health, and Welfare.

Parker B Watson, Emily Jiral, Melinda Grimes, Gregory S Archer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parker B WatsonDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4562-1682
Emily JiralDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Melinda GrimesDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Gregory S ArcherDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoultry are highly sensitive to lighting photoperiod, intensity, and color, yet little research has combined these components into a single broiler-targeted lighting program. This study evaluated an integrated dynamic LED lighting program and a further red-light dawn/dusk addition on broiler productivity, health, and welfare.

methodsIn Experiment 1, 960 male Cobb 500 broilers were reared for 42 d under a conventional white-LED program (CON) or a dynamic blue-emphasis LED program with declining intensity and a gradually shortening photoperiod (i.e., a lengthening dark period; DYN). In Experiment 2, 960 broilers were reared for 35 d under DYN or DYN with a gradual red-light dawn/dusk transition (RDW). Growth performance, tibia strength and ash, intestinal morphology, blood corticosterone, the heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, physical asymmetry, tonic immobility, and inversion were measured, and an illustrative income-over-feed-cost analysis was performed.

resultsDYN broilers had higher body weight and lower feed conversion ratio than CON broilers (

conclusionsAn integrated, broiler-targeted dynamic lighting program improved growth, intestinal morphology, and stress/fear indicators relative to a conventional program, and adding a red dawn/dusk transition further improved skeletal and stress outcomes without compromising growth, supporting the practical, commercial-scale use of programmable LED technology to improve broiler welfare and productivity.

Indexed as

broilercorticosteronedynamic lightingfearLEDlight spectrumstresstonic immobilitywelfare

Identifiers

PMID42883096
PMCPMC13663325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.