ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Emerging and Novel Ovine Viruses: Molecular Diagnostics, Genomic and Metagenomic Surveillance, and One Health Perspectives.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging and novel ovine viruses pose increasing threats to animal health, livestock productivity, trade, food security, and public health preparedness. Their emergence is driven by complex interactions among animal movement, mixed-species production systems, wildlife-livestock interfaces, arthropod vectors, environmental changes, and viral evolution. This review critically compares current strategies for identifying major, emerging, re-emerging, zoonotic, and newly recognized ovine viruses, with emphasis on their analytical sensitivity, turnaround time, throughput, operational cost, accessibility, field applicability, validation status, and capacity for novel-virus detection. Conventional diagnostic approaches, including virus isolation, serology, antigen detection, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry, remain essential for confirmation and flock-level surveillance but may be limited by slow turnaround, dependence on specialized facilities, reduced sensitivity at low viral loads, and an inability to identify highly divergent or unknown viruses. Targeted molecular assays, including PCR, RT-PCR, qPCR, multiplex assays, digital PCR, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-based diagnostics, have improved detection speed and sensitivity but generally require prior knowledge of viral genomic targets. Genomic and metagenomic approaches, including whole-genome sequencing, next-generation sequencing, nanopore sequencing, viral metagenomics, bioinformatics, and phylogenetic analysis, provide broader detection capabilities by enabling characterization of viral diversity, outbreak tracing, co-infection identification, and discovery of previously unrecognized viruses. However, their interpretation remains challenging due to low viral abundance, poor sample quality, host nucleic acid background, contamination, incomplete reference databases, limited computational capacity, and the inability of sequence detection alone to confirm disease causality. Therefore, future ovine virus surveillance requires integration of molecular diagnostics with active, passive, outbreak-based, risk-based, vector, wildlife, and animal-movement surveillance within a One Health framework. Linking genomic information with ecological, epidemiological, and environmental data will be essential for transforming ovine virus surveillance from reactive diagnosis toward proactive preparedness. Advances in standardized sampling, validated field diagnostics, affordable sequencing, curated databases, bioinformatics capacity, and cross-sector data sharing will strengthen early recognition, risk assessment, and preparedness against emerging viral threats in sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.