Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42883004›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Animal-Visitor Interactions: Where Do We Go from Here?

Eduardo J Fernandez, Claudia C Martinez, James Edward Brereton, Andrew Moss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduardo J FernandezSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5444-6604
Claudia C MartinezSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-4466-2028
James Edward BreretonHigher Education, University Centre Sparsholt, Westley Lane, Sparsholt, Winchester SO21 2NF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9104-3975
Andrew MossChester Zoo, Chester CH2 1LE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-3936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involve the study of both the impacts of zoo visitors on animals (visitor effects) and those of animals on zoo visitors (visitor experiences). In the last century, particularly in the last few years, AVIs have become an increasingly studied topic within zoos. However, most of this research has focused on correlational studies of the visitor effect on the behavioral welfare of mammal species. In this paper, we discuss additional considerations for future AVI research that could assist in how we study AVIs, including research incorporating: (1) animal-staff interactions, (2) non-mammalian species, and (3) improved methods and metrics used. With all three, past and potential future research are considered, including what might help in incorporating such factors. Thus, the goal is to provide the reader with a better understanding of additional AVI research factors worth consideration, as well as offering a path forward for how to advance and expand our AVI research efforts.

Indexed as

animal–staff interactionsanimal–visitor interactionsanthropogenic effectsaquariumshuman–animal interactionsvisitor–animal interactionsvisitor effectsvisitor experienceszoos

Identifiers

PMID42883004
PMCPMC13663490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.