ReviewCancers2026
The Dynamic Role of Liquid Biopsy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Emerging Opportunities and Clinical Challenges.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet predicting durable benefit and detecting resistance remain major challenges. As immunotherapy expands across disease stages, minimally invasive tools are increasingly needed to monitor response and inform treatment personalization. Liquid biopsy enables serial assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and other blood-based biomarkers, complementing tissue analysis and imaging. This review critically synthesizes evidence across resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic NSCLC, integrating ctDNA dynamics with emerging multi-omics approaches. Its contribution is to distinguish the prognostic value of circulating biomarkers from evidence that using them to guide treatment improves patient outcomes, while identifying priorities for clinical translation. Across the reviewed studies, ctDNA clearance is associated with favorable outcomes, whereas persistent or rising ctDNA signals an increased risk of recurrence or progression, sometimes before radiological detection. Methylation, fragmentomics, plasma proteomics, and immune-cell profiling may provide complementary information on tumor-immune interactions. However, low tumor shedding, clonal hematopoiesis, assay variability, and unvalidated intervention thresholds limit routine use. The expansion of perioperative immunotherapy and emerging interest in biomarker-guided treatment adaptation make this synthesis timely. Prospective interventional trials are needed to determine whether liquid biopsy can safely guide treatment escalation, de-escalation, or discontinuation. By clarifying both the promise and the limitations of longitudinal monitoring, this review informs research aimed at detecting ineffective treatment earlier and reducing unnecessary treatment exposure while preserving cancer control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.