ReviewCancers2026
Intratumoral Immunotherapy-The Future of Treating Merkel Cell Carcinoma?
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) represents a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with limited systemic therapy options for patients who fail or are ineligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Intratumoral (IT) immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy, leveraging the accessibility of tumor lesions and their inherent capacity to trigger immune responses, known as abscopal effects. This review synthesizes the current evidence on IT approaches in MCC, including Toll-like receptor agonists, cytokines, and oncolytic viruses, and highlights their distinct mechanisms of action, while emphasizing the critical need for standardized radiographic response assessment of injected and non-injected lesions. Inconsistent documentation of abscopal responses has hindered quantification of IT therapy's systemic potential, particularly in a disease where one-third of patients present with metastases and distant relapse is common. We outline MCC-specific rationale for routine lesion-level tracking, and recommendations for IT trial designs and objectives. Rigorous assessments of abscopal data will clarify IT's role as both rescue therapy and an ICI partner, potentially transforming outcomes in this refractory MCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.