ReviewCancers2026
Prognostic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive and molecularly diverse subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and human epithelial growth factor receptors. Despite advancements in therapeutic interventions, TNBC continues to remain associated with high metastatic potential, high likelihood of recurrence, and importantly, poor prognosis. Therefore, validated prognostic biomarkers are needed that can facilitate accurate prognostic assessment, drive treatment options, and lead to better clinical outcomes. This comprehensive review aims to provide a detailed overview of established and emerging prognostic biomarkers in TNBC, highlighting their biological relevance, clinical utility, and translational potential. We initially focus on the different classes of individual prognostic biomarkers and their limitations as far as prognostic stratification is concerned. We then move toward the development of multi-marker panels, further taking into account the critical factors limiting their clinical implementation. Development of standardized, clinically validated, and cost-effective multi-marker prognostic frameworks that can integrate the different aspects of tumor biology is the need of the hour. Such comprehensive approaches are expected to enhance prognostication and thereby improve outcomes in TNBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.