ReviewCancers2026
Therapy-Induced Senescence in Cancer Treatment Resistance: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Translational Opportunities.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence is a heterogeneous and context-dependent stress response that can influence cancer treatment response. Therapy-induced senescence (TIS) may initially suppress tumor growth through durable proliferative arrest, whereas persistence of senescent cells may, in specific contexts, contribute to recurrence or resistance through SASP-mediated signaling, metabolic and epigenetic remodeling, cellular plasticity, immune evasion, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. TIS also develops within tissues that may contain pre-existing senescent populations generated by aging, chronic inflammation, environmental stress, metabolic dysfunction, fibrosis, or oncogenic signaling. In this narrative review, we synthesize mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence linking senescence to resistance across chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. We explicitly distinguish experimental mechanisms, clinical associations, and evidence that has or has not undergone prospective validation. Particular attention is given to SASP signaling, cellular plasticity and cancer stemness, senescence escape, metabolic adaptation, immune surveillance, and biomarker limitations. We further evaluate emerging senolytic and senomorphic strategies and the sequential "one-two punch" paradigm, emphasizing differences between preclinical proof-of-concept and clinical evidence. Overall, current data support a context-dependent role for persistent senescence in treatment resistance, but do not establish TIS as a universal or independent cause of therapeutic failure. Clinical translation remains limited by senescence heterogeneity, lack of validated biomarkers, treatment toxicity, uncertainty regarding timing, and insufficient prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.