ArticleCancers2026
Tarlatamab in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study of Routine-Practice Outcomes.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3)-targeting bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), has demonstrated significant efficacy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in clinical trials. However, real-world clinical outcomes and its efficacy in extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) remain sparsely characterized.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of 24 adult patients with moderately pretreated advanced SCLC (n = 19) or EPSCC (n = 5) who received standard-of-care tarlatamab. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
resultsPatients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy, and 38% had baseline brain metastases. The overall intent-to-treat (ITT) ORR was 25.0%. Among response-evaluable patients (n = 18), the ORR was 33.3%. Efficacy was notably discordant between histologies: the SCLC cohort achieved an ITT ORR of 31.6% (46.2% in evaluable patients), whereas 100% of EPSCC patients experienced progressive disease. Systemic responses were observed in patients with baseline brain metastases (ORR 33.3%). The safety profile was manageable; any-grade CRS and ICANS occurred in 58% and 29% of patients, respectively. Severe (Grade ≥ 3) toxicities were rare, and tocilizumab was utilized therapeutically in 50% of patients for low-grade toxicity.
conclusionsThese real-world data are consistent with tarlatamab's systemic efficacy and tolerability in SCLC. The lack of clinical benefit observed in this small EPSCC cohort raises a hypothesis that requires prospective biomarker-correlated evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.