ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strength Evolution of Concrete with Different Coal Gangue and Fly Ash Contents.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the application feasibility of coal gangue and fly ash in underground floor concrete, this study adopted fly ash to partially replace cement and coal gangue to partially replace natural aggregates and prepared concrete specimens with various curing ages to investigate their strength evolution rules and long-term performance of floor concrete. The mix proportion was determined via physical and chemical tests on raw materials, as well as slump and compressive strength tests. The strength, stress-strain, and failure characteristics of concrete at different ages were analyzed through uniaxial compression and Brazilian splitting methods. The research results show that the optimal mix ratio is a water-binder ratio of 0.46, fly ash substitution rate of 30%, coal gangue substitution rate of 40%, and slump ≥160 mm. It meets the needs of underground pumping construction, and its 28-day compressive strength meets the requirements for C30 concrete. The concrete strength increases rapidly at early ages and grows slowly in the later stage. The compressive strength of the optimal group rises to 43.03 MPa at 70 days, an increase of 29.2% compared with its 28-day strength. The compressive strength of groups with high fly ash content is generally low. The failure mode of the specimen is mainly multi-crack breakage, with interlaced cracks and strong penetration. The research findings facilitate the large-scale disposal and utilization of coal gangue and fly ash solid wastes, cut down the consumption of natural aggregates and cement, and satisfy the development demands of green mining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.