ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Toward Intelligent Fatigue Management of Welded Metal Sheet Structures by Integrating Simulation, Sensing, and Machine Learning.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Welded metal sheets are used across automotive, aerospace, marine, and civil infrastructure applications for their high strength and light weight, yet fatigue failure remains a persistent concern in relation to their long-term structural stability. Fatigue crack growth is strongly influenced by the interaction of weld geometry and manufacturing-related defects. This review presents a comprehensive overview of fatigue-life prediction approaches, outlining the welding processes, fatigue mechanisms, computational tools, and progress made in predictive approaches central to this field. Fatigue performance is evaluated across several welding approaches, including laser beam, resistance spot, tungsten inert gas, and hybrid laser-arc welding. Advanced computational approaches for predicting fatigue life, including finite element modeling, cohesive zone modeling, crystal plasticity modeling, and multi-physics/multi-scale simulation, are also examined. Recent innovations in experimental characterization and structural health monitoring are addressed in detail. The review further highlights how machine learning-enabled digital twins and sensor fusion frameworks improve fatigue damage detection and maintenance prediction. Unlike prior reviews that treat conventional and data-driven methods separately, this work integrates welding process selection, fatigue life prediction, experimental validation, and structural health monitoring within a single closed-loop simulation-sensing-machine learning framework specific to thin welded sheets. Despite such advancements, the accurate prediction of environmental degradation and microstructural evolution remains challenging, and future research is required to integrate physics-based and data-driven models for critical welded structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.