ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vibration-Based Numerical and Experimental Analysis on Delamination Damage Identification for Composite Laminates.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Composite laminates possess excellent specific mechanical performance and are widely adopted in aerospace, rail transit and national defense industries, whereas interlayer delamination, as a typical concealed damage, seriously threatens structural safety. Most existing vibration-based delamination detection algorithms rely on intact structure baseline data, which restricts their practical engineering application. Aiming at this limitation, this paper investigates two baseline-free delamination identification approaches combining modal shape curvature and uniform load surface (ULS) curvature for eight-layer symmetric cross-ply composite laminates. Finite-element models containing boundary-layer and middle-layer delamination are established using the node-merging method. Modal shape curvature and ULS curvature are computed via the central difference method, and two baseline-free schemes, namely the surface smoothing algorithm and curvature mode change rate method, are implemented for damage feature extraction. Three quantitative evaluation indices, including Peak to Background Ratio (PBR), localization error and Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), are introduced to objectively compare the identification performance of different curvature indicators and algorithms. Numerical results demonstrate that both methods can effectively locate delamination under 3% random measurement noise. Boundary-layer delamination yields more prominent damage features than middle-layer delamination; modal shape curvature outperforms ULS curvature with 1.29-1.53 times higher PBR and 1.23-1.52 times higher SNR, alongside reduced localization error. Under identical conditions, the curvature mode change rate method achieves 1.51-1.99 times higher PBR, 1.22-1.36 times higher SNR and localization error reduced to 0.50-0.79 of that obtained by the surface smoothing algorithm. Scanning laser Doppler vibration tests on carbon-fiber specimens with preset delamination defects further validate the proposed methods. Experimental results reveal that under actual measurement noise, the curvature mode change rate method attains maximum PBR of 12.56, localization error down to 6.46 mm and SNR up to 14.13 dB, exhibiting better comprehensive performance compared with the surface smoothing algorithm. This work provides quantitative reference for baseline-free delamination detection of composite laminates and offers a feasible technical route for practical non-destructive inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.