ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Thermal Damage of Serpentine Concrete Under Microwave Volumetric Versus Muffle Furnace Surface Heating.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serpentine concrete is a key shielding material in nuclear engineering, and its thermal damage behaviour under irradiation-induced self-heating is closely related to structural safety. This study compares microwave volumetric heating (MW), which simulates internal heat generation, with muffle furnace surface heating (MF), which represents conventional external heating, at temperatures from 150 to 800 °C. The two heating mechanisms produced opposite temperature gradients: MW generated an inward-to-outward gradient, while MF produced a top-to-bottom gradient. These contrasting gradients led to distinct damage pathways-inside-out cracking versus top-down spalling-and different damage progression rates. In the critical dehydration range of 300-450 °C, the mass loss increment under volumetric heating (7.40%) was 3.2 times that under surface heating (2.29%). At 450 °C, the strength retention of the MW group (20.4%) was substantially lower than that of the MF group (77.7%). A heating-mechanism correction factor κ ≈ 0.25 is proposed to adjust surface-heating-based strength predictions to volumetric heating conditions. A comprehensive damage index D, integrating mass loss, crack development, and mechanical degradation, showed that severe damage under volumetric heating occurs approximately 200 °C earlier than under surface heating. These findings provide a quantitative framework for assessing thermal damage in concrete subjected to internal heat generation, with implications for nuclear safety assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.