ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Additive Manufacturing of Bioresorbable Tracheal Stents from PDO/PCL Blends: Effects of Composition and Processing on Structure and Properties.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is an additive manufacturing (AM) technology that enables the fabrication of complex and patient-specific devices made of biodegradable polymers. The successful implementation of the process requires exhaustive control of the workflow, focusing on material selection, device design, and manufacturing parameters. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the printability, processability, and mechanical performance of a polymer blend for the fabrication of customized airway stents using FDM printing, with a focus on its potential industrial scalability. Two FDM manufacturing approaches were evaluated using standard geometries to manufacture a blend of biodegradable polymers, using either filaments or pellets as feedstock. Moreover, the suitability of a blend made of polycaprolactone (PCL) and polydioxanone (PDO) for manufacturing tracheal stents was studied in comparison to their pure forms. Regarding the manufacturing technology, the feeding method itself was not the primary factor affecting the mechanical properties of the printed components, which was directly related to the geometry of the device and the cooling time polymers required. Furthermore, although the PCL/PDO blend showed a slightly higher mean elastic modulus than pure PCL, the resulting material did not exhibit sufficient radial resistance for airway stent applications. The design and development of 3D-printed medical devices require an evaluation of the entire manufacturing workflow. Device geometry and material selection are strongly influenced by the manufacturing technology selected and have a direct impact on the mechanical performance of the final product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.