Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42882610›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Polyurethane-Chitosan Composites for Tissue Engineering: Novel Strategies, Therapeutic Potential and Limitations.

Karolina Kędra, Marcin Sobczak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karolina KędraInstitute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 44/52 Kasprzaka Str., 01-224 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-1618
Marcin SobczakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Biomaterials, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1 Str., 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7362-8881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethane-chitosan (PU-CS) composites have emerged as promising biomaterials for tissue engineering because they combine the tunable mechanical properties, elasticity, processability, and degradation behavior of polyurethanes (PU) with the hydrophilicity, biological functionality, and antimicrobial properties of chitosan (CS). This review critically analyzes PU-CS composites with particular emphasis on the relationships between polymer composition, intermolecular interactions, phase organization, scaffold architecture, physicochemical properties, degradation, and biological performance. Particular attention is given to hydrogen bonding and other interfacial interactions governing composite organization, as well as to the effects of PU chemistry, CS molecular characteristics, PU/CS ratio, porosity, fiber organization, and fabrication strategy. Cross-study comparison indicates that no single PU/CS composition or scaffold architecture is universally optimal and that regenerative performance cannot be predicted from polymer ratio alone. Instead, composition must be considered together with hydration, mechanics, morphology, biodegradation kinetics, and tissue-specific requirements. Current evidence demonstrates promising cytocompatibility and regenerative potential of PU-CS systems, particularly in wound healing and selected bone, cardiovascular, and other tissue-engineering applications. However, the evidence base remains predominantly preclinical. Major barriers to translation include raw-material variability, insufficient standardization, limited long-term and large-animal data, manufacturing reproducibility, sterilization effects, scale-up, and regulatory complexity. Emerging approaches, including advanced biofabrication, computational modeling, and artificial intelligence, may further support PU-CS development, although their direct application to this material class remains limited. Overall, future progress will depend on shifting from descriptive optimization of individual scaffold properties toward reproducible, quantitatively characterized, and translationally oriented PU-CS biomaterial design. This review critically evaluates recent progress in PU-CS composite biomaterials by integrating evidence from fundamental polymer chemistry, materials engineering, biology, regenerative medicine, and translational biomaterials research.

Indexed as

biomedical chitosanbiomedical polyurethanebiomedical polyurethane–chitosan compositescomposite biomaterialsregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42882610
PMCPMC13666096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.