ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Injectable Thermoresponsive Hydrogels for Antibacterial Applications: Design Strategies, Antibacterial Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels provide flowable precursors that form local depots on warming, offering a route to sustained antibacterial delivery in irregular tissue defects. This narrative review examines how thermal gelation, carrier architecture, and anatomical conditions jointly determine antibacterial exposure. It distinguishes polymer phase separation from macroscopic gelation, injectable precursors from topical and instilled formulations, and bacterial killing from biofilm and host-repair outcomes. Representative studies are compared by composition, delivery, thermal behavior, release conditions, microbiological endpoints, and animal model. Three design considerations emerge: gelation must occur within a practical administration window; drug availability depends on both the carrier and its local residence; and the required balance of retention, clearance, and tissue compatibility differs across wounds, infected bone defects, periodontal pockets, and ocular surfaces. Direct loading, particle-in-gel depots, contact-active components, and light-mediated treatments address different parts of this problem and require distinct efficacy and safety measurements. Current evidence supports preclinical antibacterial and regenerative applications, while heterogeneity in exposure and outcome measurements limits comparison across platforms. Progress toward clinical use depends on connecting formulation manufacture and material fate with local antibacterial exposure and indication-specific outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.