ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Progressive Changes in Commercial Orthopedic Drill Bits During Repeated Drilling of Synthetic Bone: Drill-Point Geometry, Thrust Force, Feed Work, and Hole Diameter.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated use can alter the geometry and functional performance of orthopedic drill bits, yet geometry, process load, and hole dimensions are rarely tracked together. Four integrated commercial drill types-Stryker (3.2 and 3.5 mm), Synthes (4.5 mm), and Zimmer (4.3 mm)-produced successive through-holes in a 6 mm short-glass-fiber-filled epoxy cortical-bone analog at 900 rpm and approximately 40 mm/min. Projected point angle was measured intermittently, maximum thrust force and axial feed work were calculated per hole, and entrance diameter was measured optically. The primary estimand was longitudinal change within each drill type; the design was not factorial, and differences among types cannot be attributed separately to manufacturer, diameter, geometry, intended function, or alloy. Drill-type-specific models included fixed specimen intercepts. Force, work, and diameter were described using constrained monotonic functions selected by AICc, while trend inference used permutation-based Spearman tests. Point angle decreased significantly only for the Stryker drills. Force and work increased in every type, whereas entrance diameter decreased significantly for Stryker 3.5 mm, Synthes, and Zimmer. Pairwise force/work-diameter associations did not remain significant after adjustment for hole number and multiplicity. Repeated-use exposure therefore produced drill-type-specific mechanical and dimensional drift, but the study did not directly quantify cutting-edge wear or establish a causal material mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.